<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Bitmeter: Sherlock Holmes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paintbits.com/cinema/movie-bitmeter-sherlock-holmes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paintbits.com/cinema/movie-bitmeter-sherlock-holmes/</link>
	<description>Life in Colors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:57:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: .mindseas</title>
		<link>http://www.paintbits.com/cinema/movie-bitmeter-sherlock-holmes/#comment-2566</link>
		<dc:creator>.mindseas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paintbits.com/?p=2818#comment-2566</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I like Roberd Downey Jr. enough to be interested. He&#039;s ok, but the way he portrayed Iron Man didn&#039;t leave a positive image I&#039;m afraid. Neither do I like the way they&#039;ve used a known name for a movie that seems to have very little to do with the character, it&#039;s legacy and depth. 

Call it something else than Sherlock Holmes and I would be interested, but not this way. Trying to make a movie worth making through advertising and safe betting in this time and age of economic distress is understandable to a degree, but blatantly abusing a known &quot;franchise&quot; and in the process deforming it completely is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I like Roberd Downey Jr. enough to be interested. He&#8217;s ok, but the way he portrayed Iron Man didn&#8217;t leave a positive image I&#8217;m afraid. Neither do I like the way they&#8217;ve used a known name for a movie that seems to have very little to do with the character, it&#8217;s legacy and depth. </p>
<p>Call it something else than Sherlock Holmes and I would be interested, but not this way. Trying to make a movie worth making through advertising and safe betting in this time and age of economic distress is understandable to a degree, but blatantly abusing a known &#8220;franchise&#8221; and in the process deforming it completely is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

